The statement criticizes Kamala Harris and her allies for allegedly endorsing actions that could result in the death of innocent people, including conscripts, civilians, and children. It is a response to a conversation about Zelenskyy endorsing Kamala Harris while autographing ammunition, which is perceived as a controversial act. The tone is accusatory and emotional, aiming to provoke a reaction regarding the morality and implications of such endorsements.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. It uses emotionally charged language that could incite anger or hostility.
[-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it indirectly accuses Kamala Harris and her allies of being complicit in murder.
[-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses inflammatory language that could deepen divisions.
[-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a serious accusation without providing a platform for discussion or understanding.
[-2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it makes serious accusations without sufficient evidence or context.
[-1]