Reposted by Ayanna Pressley
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue, namely the overturning of Roe v. Wade and its implications, which are central to ongoing societal debates about reproductive rights and judicial decisions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as polarizing depending on the context of the video mashup.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not provide enough context to fully assess respect for privacy and dignity.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does bring attention to a significant public issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not provide a platform for constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to bring attention to a significant public issue, which can be seen as contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to inform the public about a significant issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.