Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes the Biden-Harris administration for allegedly being complicit in war crimes by lying to ensure the continuation of U.S. weapons to Israel, despite evidence that Israel blocked humanitarian aid to Gaza. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to hold the administration accountable for its actions and statements regarding the conflict.
- The statement aims to hold the administration accountable for actions that are perceived as harmful, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone could be seen as potentially harmful if not substantiated. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals by focusing on public figures and their actions rather than engaging in personal attacks or harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the alleged complicity of the U.S. administration in exacerbating it. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing specific actions and policies of the administration, although the accusatory tone could be seen as bordering on personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a significant public issue, aiming to influence public opinion and policy for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.