Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -71

The statement critiques the US healthcare system, comparing it unfavorably to other wealthy nations and advocating for Medicare for All as a solution. It also criticizes specific political figures and their healthcare plans. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived failures in the current system while promoting an alternative.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight issues in the healthcare system, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for better care. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement criticizes public figures but does not engage in personal attacks or harassment, focusing instead on their policies. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By advocating for Medicare for All, the statement promotes empathy and compassion for those uninsured or underinsured. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of policies rather than personal attacks, although it does use strong language like 'failed system.' [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for a societal change, aiming to improve healthcare. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by engaging in a public policy debate responsibly. [+1]