Robert Kennedy Jr

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 72

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically critiquing companies and their impact on societal values and the future of children in America. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a strong negative view of corporate influence and its consequences.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, as it broadly condemns companies without specific evidence or examples. This could be seen as a violation of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does generalize about companies in a way that could be seen as disrespectful to those who work for or support these companies. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a highly critical stance without offering constructive solutions or fostering dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes broad, sweeping claims without engaging with specific arguments or evidence, and it could be seen as a form of personal attack against companies. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about an issue, which could be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. However, the lack of constructive dialogue and the accusatory tone diminish its positive impact. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or with integrity, given its broad and accusatory nature. [-1]