Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political strategy and positions on Gaza and other issues. The tone is advisory and political, suggesting a course of action for a public figure to influence political outcomes.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does suggest a political strategy that could be contentious. It neither significantly aligns with nor violates this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on political strategy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting a political strategy without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to suggest a political strategy that the author believes could lead to better political outcomes, which can be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by engaging in political discourse without resorting to harmful rhetoric. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.