Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically climate change and political funding from corporations like Exxon. The tone is sarcastic and critical, suggesting skepticism about the sincerity of the climate initiative due to perceived financial ties to Exxon.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses sarcasm, which can be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of the campaign in a public manner.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses sarcasm and does not provide a constructive way forward. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its sarcastic tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.