The statement addresses concerns about state censorship and its implications for public discourse, referencing a specific article and providing a critique of government actions. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived dangers of censorship by officials.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises concerns about potential harm from censorship.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the dangers of censorship, though it could be more empathetic in its approach. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of government actions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by criticizing censorship and using the platform to discuss public concerns. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.