Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -42
9/26/2024, 8:04:02 PM
X
In reply to:
JP Mandel 🛋️
@Holquist503
·
280d
@ErnestLemingway @DonKeyusmc @KyleKulinski @mtaibbi Exactly what I was expecting.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
280d
All you assholes running to me about the Ken issue seem to have forgotten that I’ve been suppressed on this platform for over a year, and all Substack writers are deamplified here — I’m not sure what point you think you’re making.
JP Mandel 🛋️
@Holquist503
·
280d
@ErnestLemingway @DonKeyusmc @KyleKulinski That’s why I truly think this is a substack ban and not about the dossier itself. Obviously a tricky situation but @mtaibbi knows first hand how the substack ban works. Let’s see what he’s saying right now.
Gil Gamesh 🔻🪆
@ErnestLemingway
·
280d
@Holquist503 @DonKeyusmc @KyleKulinski And even if the document was posted, the information in it that's accurate--the email address isn't--is a matter of public record and easily found online.
JP Mandel 🛋️
@Holquist503
·
280d
@DonKeyusmc @ErnestLemingway @KyleKulinski it wasn’t posted to twitter. A link to his substack was. Which oddly enough is probably why the account was banned in the first place. We all think its the dossier - it very well could be Elon still doesn’t allow people to post links to substack.
marcellajay
@DonKeyusmc
·
280d
@ErnestLemingway @KyleKulinski It shouldn't be posted on Twitter and they have a policy against it, so that is why.
Gil Gamesh 🔻🪆
@ErnestLemingway
·
280d
@DonKeyusmc @KyleKulinski His phone number is a matter of public record. I found it with google in two minutes.

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the suppression of Substack links on Twitter and the potential reasons behind it. It touches on issues of platform policies, censorship, and the sharing of personal information, which are relevant to public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does discuss a potentially harmful policy (doxxing).
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy by not sharing personal information directly, but it does discuss the sharing of such information, which could be seen as problematic. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on discussing platform policies.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by discussing platform policies and their implications, but it does not use the platform irresponsibly. [+1]