Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -42
9/26/2024, 8:12:25 PM
X
In reply to:
JP Mandel 🛋️
@Holquist503
·
280d
@mtaibbi @ErnestLemingway @DonKeyusmc @KyleKulinski Clearly someone could have downloaded it and Command + F the words “Social security” or “phone number” or “home address” and acted quickly but I’m not so sure.

Interested to hear your take.
JP Mandel 🛋️
@Holquist503
·
280d
@mtaibbi @ErnestLemingway @DonKeyusmc @KyleKulinski Thanks for replying, Matt. Curious how they could have done it this fast. Is it possible X and Musk already have the dossier? We all know its been shopped around. Is there a world where X knew Ken was going to post it, and thats why they acted so quick?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
280d
@Holquist503 @ErnestLemingway @DonKeyusmc @KyleKulinski Btw while X makes it hard to access Substack links or stories, they don’t suspend you for posting links… I’m assuming they’d claim it’s a doxxing issue.
JP Mandel 🛋️
@Holquist503
·
280d
@ErnestLemingway @DonKeyusmc @KyleKulinski @mtaibbi Exactly what I was expecting.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
280d
All you assholes running to me about the Ken issue seem to have forgotten that I’ve been suppressed on this platform for over a year, and all Substack writers are deamplified here — I’m not sure what point you think you’re making.
JP Mandel 🛋️
@Holquist503
·
280d
@ErnestLemingway @DonKeyusmc @KyleKulinski That’s why I truly think this is a substack ban and not about the dossier itself. Obviously a tricky situation but @mtaibbi knows first hand how the substack ban works. Let’s see what he’s saying right now.
Gil Gamesh 🔻🪆
@ErnestLemingway
·
280d
@Holquist503 @DonKeyusmc @KyleKulinski And even if the document was posted, the information in it that's accurate--the email address isn't--is a matter of public record and easily found online.

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the suspension of an individual and the potential reasons behind it, including issues of doxxing and platform policies. This discussion touches on public concerns about free speech, platform moderation, and privacy, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises a concern about the counterproductive nature of suspensions, which could be seen as a neutral observation.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains a respectful tone. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue at hand rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by questioning the effectiveness of suspensions and their impact on public interest, using the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]