Ayanna Pressley

Rank 2 of 47
|
Score 285

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically a congressional hearing involving Ayanna Pressley and Project 2025, and it includes a call to action to vote for Kamala Harris.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause direct harm with words and actions, but it does imply negative intentions of the authors of Project 2025 without providing evidence. This could be seen as harmful if the accusations are unfounded. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does imply wrongdoing without clear evidence, which could be seen as disrespectful to the individuals involved. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it seems to take a partisan stance and implies negative intentions without fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It implies wrongdoing and incrimination without providing a basis for these claims, which could be seen as a form of personal attack. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to encourage voting for Kamala Harris, which could be seen as an attempt to better society from the author's perspective. However, it does so by implying negative intentions of others without evidence. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly by making unsubstantiated claims about the authors of Project 2025. [-1]