Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying images constitute public discourse as they engage with public issues related to election policies and voter choice. The statement advocates for Measure 117 in Oregon, which supports Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), and opposes Proposition 131 in Colorado, which is perceived to limit voter choice and increase the influence of big money in elections. The tone is assertive and aims to inform and persuade the public on these electoral measures.
- The statement strives to do no harm by promoting policies that it believes will enhance voter choice and democracy. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on policy issues rather than personal attacks. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement uses its platform to promote understanding and empathy by explaining the benefits of Measure 117 and the drawbacks of Proposition 131. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Proposition 131 without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the policy's implications. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for what it believes is the betterment of society by supporting policies that increase voter choice and reduce the influence of big money in politics. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform responsibly to inform and engage the public on important electoral issues. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.