Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the political positioning of the Democratic Party and its stance on various issues such as fracking, police reform, immigration reform, and genocide. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that the Democratic Party has shifted to the right and is unlikely to move left. The use of the term 'genocide' is particularly strong and could be seen as inflammatory.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses strong and potentially inflammatory language, particularly with the term 'genocide.' This could contribute to further polarization and harm public discourse. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in a broad and harsh critique of a political group without constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses accusatory language that is likely to deepen divisions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes sweeping generalizations and uses strong language without providing a nuanced argument or engaging with opposing views. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.