Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement by Dr. Jill Stein addresses a public issue, specifically the influence of foreign entities and lobbying groups on U.S. elected officials and political parties. It critiques the relationship between U.S. politicians and external influences, which is a substantive engagement with public concerns.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but could be seen as inflammatory, potentially leading to divisive reactions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make broad accusations that could be seen as disrespectful to the individuals and groups mentioned. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and lacks a constructive tone. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes sweeping generalizations and could be seen as a personal attack on the individuals and groups mentioned. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses Dr. Stein's influence to raise awareness about a public issue, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by questioning political influences. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to address a public concern, but the responsibility and integrity of the accusations can be questioned. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.