Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is highly charged and expresses a strong opinion on a political issue. It calls for the arrest and prosecution of a specific individual, using inflammatory language. The images show individuals participating in a protest, which aligns with the statement's context.
- The statement uses aggressive and inflammatory language, which can be harmful and incite further hostility. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual it targets, using derogatory language. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses hostile language, which can polarize and escalate tensions. This violates the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and derogatory language, which violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to call for action on a public issue, which aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. However, the aggressive tone undermines this alignment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.