Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the actions of a political figure (Netanyahu) and the response from a political activist (Jill Stein). The tone is charged and supportive of a particular viewpoint, calling for legal action against Netanyahu and promoting a political campaign.
- The statement does not directly incite violence or harm, but the charged language ('demanded Bibi be charged as a war criminal') could be seen as inflammatory. Minor violation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but calling for someone to be charged as a war criminal is a serious accusation that could impact dignity. Minor violation.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on rallying support against Netanyahu. Violation.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a rallying cry and includes a personal attack ('demanded Bibi be charged as a war criminal'). Violation.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to rally support for a political cause, which can be seen as an attempt to better society from the perspective of the speaker. Alignment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, but the responsibility and integrity of the language used can be questioned. Minor violation.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.