Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes the Biden-Harris administration for resuming student loan payments and associated financial penalties, suggesting that the administration has the discretion to extend the grace period but chooses not to. The tone is critical and expresses frustration, aiming to highlight perceived injustices in the administration's policy decisions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses strong disapproval of the administration's actions, which could contribute to public frustration. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals but criticizes public officials' policy decisions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on expressing frustration and criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of policy decisions but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to raise awareness about a public issue, aiming to influence public opinion and potentially policy. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.