Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98

The statement is highly critical of U.S. foreign policy and Israeli military actions, accusing U.S. leaders of complicity in violence and using strong language to describe the situation. The tone is accusatory and emotional, reflecting deep concern and anger over the events described. The image included supports the gravity of the situation, showing significant destruction and chaos.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight perceived harm caused by U.S. and Israeli actions, but the strong language used ('mass murder and genocide') could be seen as inflammatory and may not contribute to a constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the accusatory tone towards specific individuals (Biden and Harris) could be seen as lacking respect for their dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote empathy for the victims of the bombings, but the harsh language may polarize rather than foster understanding and compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for strong accusations and personal attacks. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a significant issue, but the approach may not be seen as responsible or constructive due to the inflammatory language. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not uphold the principles of responsible and constructive discourse. [-1]