Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98
Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Genevieve Guenther
@DoctorVive
·
274d
Today's must-read: "lobbyists working for major North American oil and gas companies were key architects of anti-protest laws that increase penalties and could lead to non-violent environmental and climate activists being imprisoned up to 10 years."

https://www.theguardian.com/us-n…
9/27/2024, 10:57:50 PM
X

The statement expresses strong criticism of a political opponent and the Democratic Party, accusing them of siding with the fossil fuel industry and failing to address environmental issues. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived corruption and lack of action on climate change. The statement is part of a broader public discourse on the influence of the fossil fuel industry on legislation and the criminalization of environmental protests.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to expose perceived wrongdoing and corruption, which can be seen as an attempt to do no harm by advocating for environmental protection. However, the accusatory tone and lack of constructive dialogue may contribute to polarization.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does attack the character of the political opponent and the Democratic Party, which may not fully respect their dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of the influence of the fossil fuel industry on legislation, which can foster empathy for environmental activists. However, the confrontational tone may hinder compassionate dialogue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks and generalizations about the Democratic Party. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to raise awareness about an important societal issue, which aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]