Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue related to immigration policy and public safety. The tone is urgent and alarming, aiming to draw attention to the presence of noncitizens with serious criminal convictions in the US. The intent appears to be to inform the public and possibly influence policy or public opinion on immigration enforcement.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by inciting fear or prejudice against noncitizens, particularly immigrants. It does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it broadly labels noncitizens with serious criminal convictions without nuance, which could contribute to cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech against immigrants. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on alarming statistics without context or solutions, which can lead to fear and division. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It presents alarming data without inviting discussion or considering alternative perspectives, and it could be seen as a personal attack on noncitizens. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it may contribute to fear-mongering and division rather than informed public discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.