Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a significant public issue involving international relations, military actions, and civilian casualties, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is critical and accusatory, focusing on the actions of a political leader and their consequences.
- The statement does not directly promote harm, but its accusatory tone could potentially incite negative reactions or hostility. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show respect for the dignity of the individuals involved, particularly Netanyahu.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on assigning blame. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is accusatory and does not invite discussion or provide a balanced perspective. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a serious issue, which could be seen as contributing to societal awareness, but the accusatory tone may undermine constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its one-sided and accusatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.