In reply to:
Derek King
@cayman4L
·
36d
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
36d
The Bull Moose
@Supt_Chalmers
·
36d
The statement by @mtaibbi constitutes public discourse as it engages with issues of free speech, censorship, and the impact of social media platforms on public dialogue. The statement expresses concerns about being deamplified on Twitter and the financial impact of defending Substack, while also reaffirming the importance of the Twitter Files project.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm and is focused on expressing personal experiences and concerns about censorship. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the actions of a public figure and a social media platform rather than engaging in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by sharing personal experiences and the perceived consequences of defending a platform. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing specific actions and policies rather than attacking individuals personally. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to highlight issues related to free speech and censorship, contributing to the betterment of society by fostering dialogue on these topics. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by discussing the impact of social media policies on public discourse and expressing a commitment to transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.