Matt Taibbi

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -10
9/30/2024, 3:46:39 AM
X
In reply to:
Myopic Matt
@Trumpshanz
·
36d
@mtaibbi What's wrong with you? Have you always been this willfully obtuse?
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
36d
@Trumpshanz Again - so what? He owns the platform. He’s not allowed to speak on? What’s wrong with you?
Myopic Matt
@Trumpshanz
·
36d
@mtaibbi The point of the while platform is to create a pulpit for him to espouse and further his world view. He's kind of a sociopath. There's a little more to it than "handling someone's option." I love heterodox shit! You're a journalist, for God's sake. Give it some thought.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
36d
@Trumpshanz Who cares what he calls it? Are you a child? You can’t handle someone’s opinion?
Myopic Matt
@Trumpshanz
·
36d
@mtaibbi See my other tweet. The key here is he's still pretending this isn't a media company.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
36d
@Trumpshanz Who cares what it does? He doesn’t get to say whatever he wants? Clearly you were able to handle it.

The statement '@Trumpshanz You’re a troll. Name the malfeasance in posting opinions. What’s the legal issue?' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a debate about the nature of online platforms, free speech, and the behavior of individuals in public discussions. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, and the intent appears to be to challenge the other user's position by questioning the legal basis of their argument and labeling them as a 'troll.'

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. Calling someone a 'troll' is a derogatory term that can be harmful and dismissive. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others. Labeling someone a 'troll' can be seen as a form of cyberbullying or harassment. (-2 points) [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and dialogue. Instead of addressing the argument, it resorts to a personal attack by calling the other user a 'troll.' (-2 points) [-2]