Matt Taibbi

The statement by @Trumpshanz constitutes public discourse as it engages with the issue of free speech, media ownership, and the influence of wealth on public platforms. The tone is dismissive and somewhat confrontational, aiming to downplay concerns about the concentration of media power in the hands of the wealthy.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses concerns that could be harmful to democratic discourse. Minor violation. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Neutral.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It dismisses the concerns of others without addressing them constructively. Minor violation. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the concerns of others and uses a somewhat condescending tone. Minor violation. [-1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does so in a way that dismisses legitimate concerns about media ownership and influence. Neutral.