The statement and accompanying image address a serious and sensitive issue involving conflict, casualties, and political responses. The tone is critical and accusatory, particularly towards Kamala Harris for not mentioning the innocent lives lost. The content highlights the human cost of the conflict and criticizes the perceived lack of acknowledgment from a political figure.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to highlight the human cost of the conflict, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by raising awareness. However, the accusatory tone towards Kamala Harris may not fully align with this principle.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the victims by not revealing personal details, but the accusatory tone towards Kamala Harris could be seen as a form of public shaming.
 [-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes empathy and compassion for the victims by highlighting their plight, but it does so in a way that may polarize opinions rather than foster understanding.
 [+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism of Kamala Harris, but it does not do so constructively and instead focuses on a perceived omission, which could be seen as a personal attack.
 [-1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a significant issue, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. However, the accusatory tone may undermine this positive aspect.
 [+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principle of free speech by expressing a critical viewpoint, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform could be questioned due to the accusatory nature of the criticism.