Luke Morrison ⚡️ 🇨🇦 🇬🇧
@lukejmorrison
·
32d
The statement 'They can start by not voting for Democrats. Their views on speech alone are disqualifying but point out an amazing fact: they tried to get every candidate or party that even could have opposed them for the presidency this cycle removed from the ballot. Every one.' constitutes public discourse as it engages with political issues and public concerns about free speech and electoral integrity.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as polarizing and divisive, which might indirectly contribute to societal harm. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes a political party but does not attack individuals. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more accusatory and divisive. Violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad accusation without engaging in a meaningful discussion. Violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as irresponsible by making broad accusations without evidence. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.