In reply to:
Salomon 🪷
@SalomonSpeaks
·
32d
The statement 'Un peu…' is a brief and somewhat ambiguous reply to a conversation about shadow banning on social media, which itself is a response to a speech about freedom of speech. The original conversation and the linked speech address significant public issues related to freedom of speech and social media censorship, making this part of public discourse. However, the specific reply 'Un peu…' is too vague to provide substantive engagement with the issues discussed.
- The statement does not cause harm but is too vague to contribute positively.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity but does not engage deeply.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion due to its brevity and ambiguity.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment due to its lack of substance.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech in a meaningful way.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.