Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Revolutionary Blackout Network🥋
@SocialistMMA
·
234d
The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the media's reaction to a political figure, Jill Stein, and her potential impact on future elections. The tone is critical and anticipatory, suggesting that negative media coverage ('smears') is expected. The statement and images imply a bias in media coverage and a defensive stance against anticipated criticism.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that harm is being done by the media through 'smears.' This could be seen as a defensive posture rather than an offensive one.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals but does not respect the dignity of the media figures it criticizes, implying they are engaging in unfair practices. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters a sense of division and anticipates conflict. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It preemptively labels media coverage as 'smears,' which could be seen as a personal attack on the integrity of the media figures involved. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public perception of media coverage, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal discourse. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.