Reposted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue, specifically the shifting trust dynamics between political groups and the US Security State. The tone is critical and somewhat incredulous, aiming to highlight a perceived irony in political attitudes over time.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but its critical tone could potentially polarize readers. However, it does not incite violence or hatred, so it moderately upholds this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques political groups but does not target individuals or use derogatory language, thus upholding this principle. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on highlighting a perceived inconsistency rather than fostering dialogue, so it does not strongly align with this principle.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of political groups but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the behavior and attitudes of groups rather than individuals, thus upholding this principle. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to discuss a public issue. It does so responsibly by referencing data and polls, thus upholding this principle. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.