Reposted by Bret Baier
איתי בלומנטל 🇮🇱 Itay Blumental
@ItayBlumental
·
80d
The statement by Israeli PM Netanyahu constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant geopolitical issue involving national security and international relations. The tone is assertive and conveys a strong stance on defense and retaliation against perceived threats from Iran. The statement emphasizes determination and a willingness to respond to aggression, which can be seen as a form of deterrence.
- The statement's assertive tone could escalate tensions, potentially leading to harm. However, it also aims to deter further aggression, which could be seen as a protective measure. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does involve strong rhetoric against specific individuals and groups, which could be seen as undermining their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; rather, it emphasizes retaliation and defense. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a unilateral declaration of intent to retaliate. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform of a national leader to assert a strong defensive stance, which can be seen as using influence to protect national interests, but it may not necessarily contribute to the betterment of broader societal relations. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.