Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses a strong opinion about the government's involvement in a serious international conflict, as highlighted by the news image. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that the government is complicit in the events described in the news. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue involving international relations and government actions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('nuts') which could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it makes a broad accusation against the government without specific evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on expressing outrage. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a strong accusation without providing a basis for discussion or understanding. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.