Jill Stien

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 31

The statement questions the actions of the Democratic Party regarding the codification of Roe v. Wade, particularly in the context of abortion bans. It is critical of the party's historical inaction despite opportunities and promises. The tone is inquisitive and somewhat accusatory, aiming to provoke thought and discussion on the issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises a critical question about political actions.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on political actions rather than personal attacks.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement could promote understanding by encouraging a discussion on the political history of abortion rights, though it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of a political party. It does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to raise a significant public issue responsibly. [+1]