Matt Taibbi

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -42

The statement expresses frustration with Democratic Party candidates' understanding of the First Amendment, referencing a common misconception about free speech. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, using informal language to convey dissatisfaction.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses dismissive language ('giving a shit') which may not promote understanding or empathy, but it does not directly cause harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it could be seen as disrespectful.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement criticizes without engaging in constructive dialogue, using a personal attack ('dorks') rather than focusing on the issue. [-1]