The statement addresses a public issue regarding pharmaceutical advertising policies in high-income countries, specifically the U.S. and New Zealand. It suggests a political action by advocating for the election of President Trump to address this issue, thus engaging in public discourse.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm with words or actions, but it could be seen as promoting a political agenda without clear evidence of harm reduction.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on political advocacy.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it does not provide a rationale for the proposed action or address potential counterarguments.
[-1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses influence to advocate for a political outcome, but it does not clearly articulate how this would benefit society.
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds free speech by expressing a political opinion, but it does not provide a responsible or well-reasoned argument for the proposed action.