Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement constitutes public discourse as it reports on significant military actions and conflicts involving Israel and Lebanon, which are of public concern and contribute to civic dialogue.
- The statement reports on violent events, which inherently involve harm, but it does not appear to glorify or incite further violence. It remains neutral in tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It reports factual events without targeting individuals or groups with derogatory language.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks elements that promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is primarily factual and does not provide context or commentary that could foster these values. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It remains focused on reporting events.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on significant events. However, the responsibility and integrity of the platform are not clear from the statement alone, as it links to an external site without further context.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.