In reply to:
TC Massachusetts
@MassachusettsTc
·
394d
The statement is part of a public conversation involving media figures and their credibility, which can be considered public discourse as it touches on issues of media reliability and accountability.
- The statement is dismissive and could be seen as disrespectful, potentially bordering on harassment, as it questions the credibility of the individual without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in a personal attack by questioning the individual's ability to confirm their own name, rather than addressing the substance of their claim or engaging in constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.