Scott Waldman
@scottpwaldman
·
125d
The statement criticizes a former president's alleged behavior of using political affiliation as a criterion for disaster aid, suggesting a lack of understanding of presidential duties. It engages in public discourse by addressing the ethical responsibilities of a public official in disaster response.
- The statement implies harm in the alleged actions of the former president, but does not itself use harmful language.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize a public figure's actions.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the ethical responsibilities of a president, but does so in a critical manner. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but could be seen as a personal attack on the former president's knowledge and capabilities. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight an important issue regarding disaster aid and political bias. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to discuss a significant public concern. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.