Reposted by Bret Baier
Meredith Lee Hill
@meredithllee
·
160d
The statement and conversation refer to a political decision and the vetting process of a public figure, which involves public accountability and transparency. It touches on public discourse as it relates to political decision-making and the integrity of public figures.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights a potential oversight in the vetting process.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information beyond what is publicly relevant.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a flaw in the vetting process without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implies a need for acknowledging and correcting mistakes in the vetting process. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses the platform to discuss a public issue responsibly, focusing on the integrity of political processes. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.