The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the ethics of suppressing information, particularly in the context of hacked materials and doxing. It questions the consistency of decisions made by social media platforms regarding the publication of potentially newsworthy information.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for transparency and the dissemination of newsworthy information. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by acknowledging the issue of doxing, which involves the unauthorized release of private information. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the reasons behind the suppression of the Vance dossier and expressing disagreement with the decision. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive dialogue by addressing disagreements without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss the broader implications of information suppression, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.