Reposted by Bret Baier
James Lynch
@jameslynch32
·
161d
The statement criticizes the media's portrayal of President Biden, comparing it to the coverage of former President Jimmy Carter. It suggests that Biden is not adequately informed about a significant storm, implying a lack of awareness or engagement with current events. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived discrepancies in media coverage and presidential responsibility.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but implies criticism of the President's awareness, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the dignity of the President by implying incompetence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a critical assertion without offering a platform for discussion or understanding. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity if it does not provide evidence for its claims. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.