Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages with public discourse by addressing the issue of military intervention and its impact on people, aligning with a broader critique of the political system.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a preference for non-violent policies, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, respecting the dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the impact of military actions on people. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on policy critique. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a political candidate who aligns with the speaker's values, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a political opinion and using the platform to support a candidate responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.