The statement critiques the relationship between the CDC and pharmaceutical companies, suggesting a conflict of interest that disadvantages the public. It implies skepticism about the integrity of public health funding and regulation.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but implies a critique of a system that may harm public interest.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a potential issue in public health funding, though it could be more empathetic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the CDC's funding structure but does not attack individuals personally. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a potential public issue, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing a public concern with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.