The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the influence of Wall Street on political candidates and the need for a more open political process. It suggests that the current system limits public access to diverse political candidates, which is a substantive engagement with public discourse.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a systemic issue rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of a perceived problem in the political process and calls for change, which can foster empathy and compassion for those feeling disenfranchised. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques a system, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By highlighting an issue in the political process, the statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by addressing a public concern responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.