Jill Stien

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 26

The statement criticizes U.S. foreign policy, suggesting that the current administration is unduly influenced by another nation's leader, which is a significant public issue. The tone is accusatory and urgent, calling for immediate action to stop support for actions described as 'genocidal.'

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of those involved, using terms like 'genocidal' which could be considered as inflammatory and accusatory. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on blame rather than dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses accusatory language rather than fostering dialogue. [-2]