The statement engages in public discourse by addressing political issues and expressing a critical opinion about the Democratic Party, suggesting they are part of a larger problem related to fascism and genocide. It also promotes a political figure, Dr. Jill Stein, implying support for her views or campaign.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the strong language could contribute to divisive rhetoric.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it uses strong language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more accusatory and divisive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a broad accusation without specific evidence or engagement with opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive, given the accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.