Jill Stien

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score 11

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the public issue of former President Donald Trump's stance on war and military actions, particularly in relation to Iran. It challenges the notion that Trump is anti-war, suggesting that his statements contradict such a claim.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to polarization by labeling a viewpoint as a 'big lie.' [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use strong language that could be seen as dismissive.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and dismissive. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it labels a viewpoint as a 'big lie' without further explanation or engagement. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but could use the platform more responsibly by fostering dialogue rather than dismissing opposing views. [-1]