Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses frustration with a segment of the political left who dismiss the idea of voting for the Green Party. It suggests that this attitude is akin to 'Peter Pan' thinking, implying a lack of maturity or realism. The statement is part of a broader political discourse about voting strategies and political engagement.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the use of 'Peter Pan shit' could be seen as dismissive or belittling, which might indirectly harm discourse by alienating some individuals. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding and engagement by encouraging discussion about voting strategies, but the dismissive language may undermine empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue about political strategy but uses a metaphor that could be interpreted as a personal attack, which detracts from constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a political opinion and encourages discussion, but the language could be more responsible and respectful.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.