The statement expresses skepticism about the efforts towards achieving a ceasefire, suggesting that the claims of 'working tirelessly' are insincere. It is a critical commentary on the actions or perceived inactions of those involved in the ceasefire process.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement could be seen as potentially harmful if it undermines trust in diplomatic efforts, but it also highlights a perceived lack of action, which can be important for accountability.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism of the ceasefire efforts, but it does not provide constructive dialogue or solutions, focusing instead on expressing frustration.
[-1]