Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement critiques the response of the current administration to a natural disaster, drawing a comparison to past events and media coverage. It implies a double standard in media reporting based on political affiliation.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of media bias.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it focuses on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived media bias, which can be seen as contributing to societal discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint on media coverage. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.