Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses strong criticism of Blinken, suggesting legal action against him for his role in the situation involving humanitarian relief to Gaza. It reflects a highly charged and accusatory tone, calling for immediate arrest based on perceived wrongdoing.
- The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words, as it calls for arrest without due process, potentially inciting further conflict. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of others, as it involves a personal attack on Blinken without substantiated evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism, opting instead for a personal attack and extreme measures without dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.